As any attorney practicing law knows, each new case brings its own unique issues and problems. Frequently, these issues spill into specialized areas of law that the attorney may not be familiar with, but that must be visited to properly represent the client’s interests. Can an attorney provide competent representation herself on these issues, or is outside legal advice needed?
The Professional Rules of Conduct state that an attorney shall not fail to perform legal services with competence. (Prof. Cond. Rules, rule 3-110 (A).) Competence in performing legal services means the diligence, learning and skill, and mental, emotional, and physical ability necessary. (Rule 3-110 (B).) The rules further provide that an attorney unable to perform legal services competently may nonetheless continue with the representation and meet the requisite level of competency by associating or consulting with another lawyer reasonably believed to be competent, or by acquiring the skill and knowledge that is required. (Rule 3-110(C).) Continue reading
Nursing homes and long term health care facilities are always at risk of liability for elder abuse. Even the most careful facilities with the most stringent hiring practices can find themselves facing allegations of neglect and abuse. To ensure compliance with laws and reduce liability, such facilities should ensure its employees and administrators understand and comply with abuse reporting requirements. Continue reading
Pursuant to California Law, all plans submitted by an engineer must include his or her name or license number. Furthermore, all plans released for construction must contain the engineer’s signature and seal or stamp, as well as the date of signing. (Bus. & Prof. Code §6375(a).) Additionally, Business and Professions Code section 5536.1 requires that all persons preparing plans, specifications, and instruments of service for others to sign them and, if licensed as an architect, to affix a stamp “as evidence of the person’s responsibility for those documents.” What liability does this create in the engineer? Continue reading
Currently pending before the California Supreme Court is the issue of whether an architect providing professional services to a residential developer can be held liable to the purchasers of the residences for negligence in his performance of his services. In Beacon Residential Community Assn. v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLP (2013) 211 Cal.App.4th 1301, the defendants were design professionals offering architectural and engineering services to the Beacon Residential Condominiums, which consisted of 595 condo units. The plaintiff was the managing community association that sued Skidmore, among others, alleging construction defects. As to Skidmore, the plaintiff alleged it owed to the association and future home owners a duty of care, and that its professional negligence caused it to breach that duty when it violated residential construction standards.
In a recent new bulletin, the California Insurance Commissioner addressed the issue of notice requirements after a breach of security information or improper disclosure of personal information by insurers, insurance producers, and other interested persons. Continue reading
By Steven Markowitz
In the aftermath of the United States Supreme Court case, AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, (2011) 131 S. Ct. 1740 (“Concepcion”) California courts have begun revising state law regarding the enforceability of contractual arbitration clauses, including in the employer-employee context. Continue reading
Currently pending before the California Supreme Court is the case of Winn v. Pioneer Medical Group, Inc.(2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 875 wherein the Court will determine if a health care provider can commit neglect within the meaning of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act when it fails to refer a patient to a specialist if the care is outpatient, or if an action for neglect must allege a custodial relationship. Continue reading